home
site news
atari news
atari glossary
atari history
atari video game systems
  > atari 2600
  > atari 5200
  > atari 7800
  > atari lynx
  > atari jaguar 64
      > technical specs
      > really 64bits?
      > pcb-layout
      > cartridge tech
      > hardware
      > software
      > collection
      > gallery
      > 'panther' project
      > jaguar 2
      > cojag
      > kiddie rides
      > 'do the math'
  > atari jaguar CD
  > atari xegs
atari computers
atari coin-op
atari stand-alone-systems
atari library
atari theater
atari links
legal stuff/imprint
contact us

Is the Jaguar really a 64bit-system?

Q: 'Is  the Jaguar really a 64bit-system?'

A: Well, there's no simple answer to that question! Talking about the Jaguar as the first 64bit-system years before the Nintendo 64, people will look at you and say 'Yeah, right! The Jaguar! What was the Jaguar?'
No, to be honest:

The biggest problem in this discussion is, that there is NO definition about what makes a system an 'x-bit' system. Some people believe that the main processor determines how many bits there are in a system; if you take the CPU, the Jaguar IS a 64bit-system, because 'TOM' truely is 64bit and was meant to be the main processor! 'TOM' communicates via the 64bit system-bus! (=> see the Jaguar's block-diagram)


Q: 'But there is a 68000 in the system!'

A: Right, but the Motorola 68000 was meant to be ONLY responsible for boot-strapping, timing, reading the ports, etc. The 68000 wasn't meant to be used as a real CPU, though many programmers DID use it making the Jaguar an 'underachiever' in many ways!


Q: 'But the expansion port is only 32bit, too!'

A: That isn't of any matter, because ALL RELEVANT communication within the Jaguar is done in 64bit!
For example: there is definately no need for sound devices to communicate via a 64bit bus.

 

John Mathieson, one of the Jaguar designers:

'Jaguar has a 64-bit memory interface to get a high bandwidth out of cheap DRAM. [...] Where the system needs to be 64 bit then it is 64bit, so the Object Processor, which takes data from DRAM and builds the display is 64bit; and the blitter, which does all the 3D rendering, screen clearing, and pixel shuffling, is 64 bit. Where the system does not need to be 64 bit, it isn't. There is no point in a 64bit address space in a games console! 3D calculations and audio processing do not generally use 64bit-numbers, so there would be no advantage to 64bit processors for this. [...] Jaguar has the data shifting power of a 64bit-system, which is what matters for games, so can reasonably be considered a 64bit-system. But that doesn't mean it has to be 64bits throughout.' (Taken from the Jaguar FAQ)

Contents and pictures 1999 - 2022 by 'www.atarihistory.de' unless otherwise noticed